PRIVATIZATION OF SECURITY SERVICES IN NIGERIA: THE PSYCHOSOCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Abstract

The escalating insecurity in Nigeria has prompted the exploration of privatized security services as a viable alternative to complement State (nation’s) security forces overwhelmed by challenges such as terrorism, armed banditry, and organized crime. The objective of this research is to examine the psychological implications associated with the privatization of security services in Nigeria, focusing on the implications for both security personnel and the broader society. The research is anchored on the General Strain Theory by Agnew (1985). While privatized security services provide specialized solutions to fill gaps created by underfunded State agencies, they also raise important concerns regarding the mental wellbeing of security personnel, including stress, emotional exhaustion, and job dissatisfaction due to hazardous working conditions. Moreover, the growing reliance on private security firms has led to certain psychosocial implications, such as erosion of trust in State institutions and the creation of a two-tiered security system that exacerbates existing social inequalities. This research, using a non-empirical approach, draws on existing literature and personal observations to analyse the psychological implications of privatized security. The research also proposes the need for policies that promote the wellbeing of security providers, equitable and accountable security systems. The findings contribute to the discourse on security privatization, governance, and the psychosocial implications. This offers insights into the challenges, risks and benefits associated with this growing trend in Nigeria. It is therefore recommended that governments must strengthen public security systems to reduce overreliance on privatized security services.