Islamic Cooperative Societies and Health Economics in Nigeria: A Critical Review of Their Potential for Financial Protection, Equity and Community-Based Health Financing

Authors

  • Nasir AA; Abiola TA Author

Keywords:

Islamic cooperatives, health economics, Nigeria, financial risk protection, Maqasid al-Shariah.

Abstract

Background: Islamic cooperatives are increasingly discussed in Nigeria as ethical, interest-free institutions for savings, credit, welfare and community empowerment. Their relevance to health economics, however, remains underdeveloped. This review examines whether Islamic cooperatives can move beyond general socioeconomic support to become practical instruments for financial risk protection, strategic purchasing and equitable health financing in Nigeria. Methodology: This was a critical narrative review. The source seminar on Islamic cooperatives was treated as the primary conceptual material, while verifiable literature on health economics, Nigerian health financing, Islamic finance, community-based health financing, cooperative development, catastrophic health expenditure and health insurance reform was purposively reviewed. The review was organised around core health-economic functions: revenue mobilisation, pooling, purchasing, benefit design, governance, equity and system integration. Results: The seminar provides a strong normative foundation centred on ta’awun, Maqasid al-Shariah, prohibition of riba, risk sharing, transparency and ethical investment. Yet, in its present form, the model remains economically incomplete for health financing because it under-specifies actuarial design, provider payment, benefit packages, adverse-selection control and regulatory interoperability with the National Health Insurance Authority. A health-economic reinterpretation suggests that Islamic cooperatives could support household health savings, qard hasan emergency funds, cooperative takaful-type risk pools, subsidised coverage for vulnerable groups through zakat and waqf, and formal partnerships with State Social Health Insurance Agencies and the Basic Health Care Provision Fund. Their strongest comparative advantage lies in informal-sector trust, faith-linked mobilisation and local accountability. Their main risks are small pool size, weak technical capacity, exclusion in multicultural settings and insufficient governance. Conclusion: Islamic cooperatives could become useful complements to Nigerian health financing if they are redesigned from simple thrift-and-loan platforms into professionally governed, Shariah-compliant community financing institutions linked to universal health coverage architecture. The most promising pathway is a hybrid model that combines cooperative savings, cooperative risk pooling, compassionate finance and public purchasing. This review proposes such a model and argues that its relevance may extend beyond Muslim-majority settings to any context seeking ethical, solidarity-based health financing.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-08